Insight

Thailand’s land-nominee crackdown: when can land have to be sold?

Distinguish the DSI enforcement announcement from an individual land-disposal decision, review Land Code sections 94 and 96, and prepare notices, corporate and funding records.

On 19 October 2026, Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) reported its participation in a briefing on action against nominees, compulsory disposal and higher-risk landholdings. It described inquiries into controllers, beneficial owners and related assets. This was an enforcement announcement. It did not enact a new Land Code that day or order every landowning company to sell.[Official source]

When can disposal proceedings arise?

Section 94 of the Land Code concerns land acquired by a foreigner unlawfully or without permission. The competent authority fixes a disposal period of at least 180 days and no more than one year; failure to dispose within it permits official disposal. Section 96 addresses ownership on behalf of a foreigner or a juristic person under sections 97 or 98, authorises disposal and applies section 94 with the necessary adaptations. The applicable provision, decision-maker and actual deadline require review of the findings, authority and formal documents. There is no universal countdown from the news date.[Official source][Official source]

A foreign shareholder alone does not establish nominee ownership, and a nominal Thai majority does not automatically establish legality. Review the landholder’s eligibility under land law, actual funding and control. Do not substitute the Foreign Business Act’s definitions for the Land Code analysis. Genuine operations and any landholding permission need supporting evidence; the permitted holder, use and continuing conditions must match the present position.

First distinguish an information request from a disposal decision

Keep the complete document, attachments, envelope and actual receipt record. Identify the issuing authority, reference, addressee, land parcel, legal basis, requirements and response date. An inquiry or request for documents differs from a formal disposal decision. Check any objection, administrative or court remedy and its deadline against each document; the heading alone does not determine the procedure.

Build a record of how the land was acquired

  • Land: title and registration records, acquisition documents, purchase contract, payments, mortgages and other encumbrances.
  • Company: current and historical shareholders, actual capital contributions, resolutions, signing authority and share transfers.
  • Funding and use: purchase-money sources, loans and repayments, bank records, operations and actual land use, together with any genuine landholding permission.

Link each dated record to the parcel, payer, recipient and shareholder. Identify missing periods and obtain records through lawful channels. A recent company affidavit does not replace the funding evidence at acquisition; a personal assurance or nominal loan document may not explain the arrangement. A prospective buyer of a landholding company should review that history before deciding to proceed.

Plan the response and avoid making the position worse

Have a Thai lawyer assess the procedural stage, evidence gaps and response before comparing explanations, objections, remedies or lawful disposal. If a transfer is contemplated, review the buyer’s eligibility, security interests, contracts and taxes. Rushed shareholder changes, renaming the owner, backdated loans or fabricated contributions do not resolve the historical facts.

An investigation does not itself establish a conviction or confiscation. Land disposal, possible criminal liability and civil contractual consequences require separate analysis. A condominium interest, building, land lease and company shares are also different rights; rules for one should not simply be applied to another.

How THAIHOUSING can assist

Once an engagement is confirmed, conflicts checked and scope agreed, THAIHOUSING can arrange review by Thai lawyers of the notice, land, corporate and funding records, identify missing evidence and assess responses, disputes and disposal options. Representation and individual procedures require separate confirmation. Findings and official decisions cannot be guaranteed.

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Must everyone sell within 180 days?

Section 94 sets a statutory range for an authority-fixed period, while section 96 provides for adapted application. Check the formal documents for your obligation and starting point; do not calculate from the news date.

Will appointing a different Thai shareholder solve the problem?

That cannot be assumed. Historical acquisition, genuine funding, control and the legality of the new transaction still require review.

What if no notice has arrived?

A landholding company can organise its title, shareholder and funding history. Prospective purchasers should complete historical due diligence before deciding to transact.

Last checked: 20 October 2026. The reported event and publication date were 19 October. The cited official materials were checked; each matter still requires review of the acquisition, notice and evidence.

Sources

  1. DSI briefing on land-nominee enforcement, compulsory disposal and high-risk landholdings

    Department of Special Investigation, Ministry of Justice · Event and publication: 19 October 2026, 14:57. Statements on actual controllers, beneficial owners and related asset inquiries.

    Accessed:

  2. Department of Lands compilation of the Land Code and related laws

    Department of Lands · PDF page 58 (index 57), sections 94–96. Section 96 applies section 94 mutatis mutandis. The URL path date is not an amendment or commencement date.

    Accessed:

  3. Department of Lands Order No. 367/2568: Delegation Schedule

    Department of Lands · Order dated 5 February 2025; items 11.4–11.6 and 11.8–11.9; extracted page labels P15–P16 (zero-based indexes).

    Accessed:

Book a Consultation

Office and contact options